My Nebula, Hugo, and Locus Award nominations

Below are my nominations for the Hugo, Nebula, and Locus Awards.  The deadline for Nebula nominations is February 15 while Hugo nominations are due March 11. The Locus Award deadline is April 15 and their "recommended reading" list is in the current February 2012 issue.

Please note my nominations are arranged in alphabetical order by title. I should also note that Ken Liu had an amazing year as a writer, with two nominations on my list. In addition, his short story "Staying Behind" from Clarkesworld was on my nomination short list (but was bumped by his equally amazing "The Paper Menagerie").

Novel

  • God's War by Kameron Hurley (Nightshade books)
  • Osama by Lavie Tidhar (PS Publishing)
  • Soft Apocalypse by Will McIntosh (Nightshade Books)
  • The Kingdom of Gods by N.K. Jemisin (Orbit)
  • The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi (Tor)

Novella

  • Kiss Me Twice by Mary Robinette Kowal (Asimov's)
  • The Alchemist by Paolo Bacigalupi * With Unclean Hands by Adam Troy-Castro (Analog)
  • The Ice Owl by Carolyn Ives Gilman (Fantasy and Science Fiction)
  • The Man Who Bridged the Mist by Kij Johnson (Asimov's)
  • The Man Who Ended History: A Documentary by Ken Liu (Panverse)

Novelette

  • Fields of Gold by Rachel Swirsky (Eclipse 4)
  • Mortal Bait by Richard Bowes (Dark Horse)
  • Ray of Light by Brad Torgersen (Analog)
  • Six Months, Three Days by Charlie Jane Anders (Tor.com)
  • The Old Equations by Jake Kerr (Lightspeed)

Short Story

  • For Love's Delirium Haunts the Fractured Mind, by David Mercurio Rivera (Interzone/Fictionwise)
  • Movement by Nancy Fulda (Asimov's)
  • Shipbirth by Aliette de Bodard (Asimov's)
  • The Paper Menagerie by Ken Liu (F&SF)
  • The World Is Cruel, My Daughter by Cory Skerry (Fantasy)

Bradbury

  • Attack the Block by Joe Cornish (Big Talk Pictures)
  • Doctor Who: The Doctor's Wife by Neil Gaiman (BBC Whales / BBC America)
  • The Adjustment Bureau by George Nolfi (Universal Pictures)

Norton

  • Akata Witch by Nnedi Okorafor (Viking Children's)
  • Anya's Ghost by Vera Brosgol (First Second)
  • Nightspell by Leah Cypess (Greenwillow)

* I totally forgot that The Alchemist by Paolo Bacigalupi was a finalist for last year's Nebula and is not eligible for this year's awards. My bad on that. So I've substituted the next novella from my shortlist.

We can only hope Google+ squashes Facebook like the privacy-killing stinkbug it is

I'll admit that headline is partly tongue in cheek, but it does express my sincere dream of Facebook's ultimate fate. And I say that as someone who has used Facebook for years and will continue to do so for the near future.

Here's the thing: I'm neither an extreme privacy nut nor a let-it-all-hang-out-online type of guy. Obviously I don't mind sharing some personal information about myself since I have Facebook, Google+, and Twitter accounts, and I'm writing this essay on an extremely public blog. These days if you want to keep everything about your life private your only choice is to drop off the grid, become a wanderer, or be a Unabomber-style hermit (just don't mail your 50 page manifesto to the NY Times, causing your brother to recognize you). Honestly, this shouldn't surprise anyone—human society has always placed a premium on knowing all we can about each other. Go back to any human village or community over the last 10,000 years and you'll find absolutely zero privacy. Everyone knew everything about you.

Aside from hermits, wanderers, and off-the grid individuals, it was only with the rise of large cities that people could escape from this all-intrusive knowledge about their lives. With large cities, it was possible for people to disappear into a large mass of humanity. You could reinvent yourself. You could become anyone you wished.

Of course, this isn't to say that people don't also know lots about you in large cities. But the possibility to create your own private space was at least there.

And now along comes social media, which threatens to take us back to the dawn of humanity. We're reverting to village groups again, where everyone knows our business.

As I mentioned, I'm mostly okay with this. So far the benefits of social media have outweighed the negatives, at least in my own life. However, two things I do demand are the abilities to control what information I put out about myself and how I interact with others online. And that's where Facebook continues to spit directly in my face.

I don't have major issues with their new Timeline feature. It is what it is. However, what I absolutely hate is the continuing lack of control Facebook gives me over my own social media experience. For example, I used to know instantly when anyone responded to one of my posts. Not anymore—those reponses are hidden in a blizzard of Facebook notifications. I've recently missed several comments from friends who posted on my status updates.

I also hate how Facebook makes it difficult for me to control all of my privacy settings. Everytime I try to change a setting, I spend a half-hour hunting for the spot where Mark Zuckerberg's drones hid said control. 

This poor Facebook experience was driven home for me when I recently examined my Google Dashboard. Talk about a complete 180 from Facebook—privacy information from all of my Google accounts was centrally located and easy to both understand and change. I'll admit that when Google announced its recent privacy changes I was concerned. But as long as they continue to offer something as brilliant as their Dashboard, I'll accept their privacy rules. Google understands that people want to both control what they put out and how they interact with others.

And that, I surpose, is the point of this ramble. I accept that by using social media I am giving Facebook, Google, and other places valuable information about myself. For now, the benefits I receive make this worth it. But Facebook is quickly failing in this cost/benefit analysis.

Facebook is now the used-car salesman of the social media world, forever trying to trick you into signing away more than you intend. Google, though, understands that they don't have to trick people into buying their groovy social media car. Yes, Google makes mistakes, but at least they lay out the information for you and allow you to make most of your own choices.

So for now I'm okay with the direction my social media village is going. Since so many of my friends use Facebook, I'll continue to show up there. But I also hope Google+ keeps growing and threatening to squash Facebook like the bug they are. Because I suspect the threat of being squashed is the only way Zuckerberg and company will eventually realize that their business model must be based on giving people the control they desire—and not the lack of control Facebook currently embraces.

Two items of an extremely exciting nature (if you like my fiction, that is)

InterGalactic Medicine Show Awards Anthology, Volume  I

IGMS Cover 1211

Spotlight Publishing, which released my collection Never Never Stories, has now published InterGalactic Medicine Show Awards Anthology, Volume  I. Edited by Orson Scott Card and Edmund Schubert, the book collects stories from Card's online magazine and includes an introduction by Peter S. Beagle and stories by me, Beagle, Eugie Foster, Aliette deBodard, Marie Brennan, Alethea Kontis, Eric James Stone, Scott Roberts, James Maxey, and many more.

You can order the book directly from Spotlight Publishing, who are also offering a limited number of copies signed by both Card and Schubert. The book is also available from Amazon and Barnes & Noble.

StarShipSofa Jason Sanford episode

In equally exciting news, the Hugo Award winning audio fiction magazine StarShipSofa has released a special issue focused on my fiction. The issue features two of my stories, an essay narrated by me, and tons of other fun stuff. StarShipSofa is one of the top SF podcasts in the world, so go check it out.

My picks for the 26th annual Asimov's Readers' Poll

The 26th annual Asimov's Readers' Poll is open for votes through February 1. As is the norm, Asimov's had a very strong year in 2011. Unfortunately, I was limited to three votes in each category. But I could have easily voted for twice as many stories.

My votes for the awards are as follows. Please note that while the actual votes for the award are ranked in order of preference, my list is organized by author last name.

Best Novella

  • The Man Who Bridged the Mist—Kij Johnson
  • Kiss Me Twice—Mary Robinette Kowal
  • Stealth— Kristine Kathryn Rusch

Best Novelette

  • Two Thieves—Chris Beckett
  • Clean—John Kessel
  • Corn Teeth—Melanie Tem

Best Short Story

  • Smoke City—Christopher Barzak
  • Shipbirth—Aliette de Bodard
  • Movement—Nancy Fulda

Best Cover

  • September—Maurizo Manzieri
  • March—Marc Simonetti
  • October/November (for “The Man Who Bridged the Mist”)—Paul Youll

“Heaven’s Touch” sells to Asimov’s and I go all touchy-feely daydreaming of childhood SF magazines

AsimovsDec1983
My grandfather's mid-December 1983 copy of Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, featuring the Hugo-winning story "Speech Sounds" by Octavia Butler. Note the mailing label still attached.

Exciting news: my novelette “Heaven’s Touch” has sold to Asimov’s Science Fiction! The story involves a race for survival on a near-future comet and is one of the hardest science fiction tales I’ve written.

This will be my first appearance in Asimov’s and I want to thank Sheila Williams for both accepting the story and giving me a number of excellent suggestions regarding rewrites. I naturally took these suggestions to heart because only a fool argues with a Hugo-winning editor whose ideas vastly improve your story!

Obviously I like Asimov’s since I subscribe to the magazine. However, Asimov’s also played a critical role in my development as a science fiction writer. When I was growing up there were three SF magazines I daydreamed about writing for—Analog, Asimov’s, and Interzone.

Because I grew up in rural Alabama, finding an issue of the British magazine Interzone was out of the question. But I continually noticed that many of the stories I loved in the various “year’s best” collections were first published in Interzone. So while I may not have seen physical copies of Interzone as a young man, the magazine still influenced me greatly.

Analog and Asimov’s were more familiar since my grandfather collected SF magazines. But of the two, my grandfather clearly had a special place in his heart for Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine—as it was then called—because he was a subscriber. I remember once when my mom picked up my grandparent’s mail while they were away on vacation. The mail contained a new issue of Asimov’s and I stared at that magazine for a long time, wondering if my grandfather would notice if I read it first.

I still have copies of my grandfather’s Asimov’s with his mailing label attached. They’re among my most valued heirlooms.

Once I left for college I subscribed to Asimov’s. This was during Gardner Dozois’ famous editorship, when he won the Hugo for best editor nearly every year while the stories he picked also dominated the major awards. On days when the magazine might arrive I’d race to my apartment, hoping to discover a new issue. The first thing I'd read each month were Issac Asimov’s editorials, followed by story after story from groundbreaking authors like Michael Swanwick, Connie Willis, Tanith Lee, Greg Egan, Mike Resnick, and many more. I even submitted a few horrible stories and poems to Gardner during those days—thankfully he rejected them quickly and without fuss.

And now I’ve landed my first Asimov’s acceptance. It’s amazing that I’ve placed stories with all the magazines I used to daydream about. But it’s also damn exciting to place a story in a magazine like Asimov’s, with which I’ve had such a long, loving relationship.

A reminder, some praise, and a great SF essay

A few items of note:

1) I'm attending Epic ConFusion this weekend in Detroit. I'm taking part in a number of panels, will be autographing Never Never Stories at the main autograph session at 5 pm on Saturday, and plan to have a ton of fun. My complete schedule is here.

2) Over at the SF Site, D. Douglas Fratz has some amazing words for my fiction. To quote:

Over the decades that I have been reading science fiction, there have been occasions when a new writer with a singular new style and vision appears whose fiction seems destined to have lasting impact on the field. Jason Sanford is one such a new writer. He writes with a confidence and skill that makes it difficult to believe that he burst onto the scene only in the past few years.

Wow! Many thanks to Fratz for the kind words and support.

3) Cory Doctorow's essay "A Vocabulary for Speaking about the Future" in the Jan. 2012 Locus is flat-out one of the best SF essays I've ever read. I plan to write more on the essay in the near future, but until then go and read it!

4) And no, I haven't forgotten about this year's Million Writers Award. Look for the initial announcement about the award next week.

The Peace Corps in a non-peaceful world

Americans often get rapped by people outside our country as being insular and ignorant of all things not prefaced with a giant, glowing U.S.A.! While there's some truth to this stereotype, it overlooks the strong desire among many Americans to bridge the differences between the United States and other countries.

One of the most famous ways Americans try to do this is with the Peace Corps. Since 1961 over 200,000 American have served in the Peace Corps, including myself and my wife, with both of us serving in Thailand. This service is not without risk. As documented by the Fallen Peace Corps Volunteers Memorial Project, 284 Peace Corps Volunteers gave their lives while pursuing the Peace Corps' mission. Many more have been injured, assaulted, or subjected to violence.

It’s for these last reasons that yesterday the Peace Corps announced it was pulling its Volunteers out of Honduras and will no longer send new Volunteers to El Salvador and Guatemala. This is obviously a controversial decision. According to Jared Metzker, a Peace Corps volunteer in Guatemala, the decision is also cowardly because PCVs understand the dangers they're signing up for.

As a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer, I understand and to a degree embrace Metzker's attitude. But I also don't want Peace Corps Volunteers to face a constant risk of serious injury or death. Peace Corps pulled out of Honduras after one Volunteer was shot (and, according to what I've heard from other Volunteers, experienced a number of rapes and near constant assaults on PCVs, which wasn't targeted at the Volunteers but instead resulted from out-of-control violence and political upheaval in that country).

During my time in the Peace Corps I was only physically threatened a single time, and was able to escape with no injury because of my large size and ability to bluff drunken idiots. However, several other Volunteers who served alongside me were raped or assaulted. And that was in the peaceful country of Thailand. A Peace Corps Volunteer who'd transfered to Thailand said that in her previous host country, every Volunteer in her training group had been physically assaulted or raped at one time or another. Every single one.

However, the experience she described was an extreme and, to a large degree, politically motivated. And before you think this violence only occurs overseas, the rate of violence among overseas PCVs is probably lower than they would experience in the U.S. In fact, the vast majority of PCVs experience no violence or threats to their safety.

But as Jared Metzker said, all Peace Corps Volunteers understand that trying to improve this world is not without risk. And when you get down to it, the reason our world needs a Peace Corps is because this world is not at peace.  

While I understand why Peace Corps pulled out of Honduras, this is still a sad occasion. Honduras had one of the largest PC missions in the world and those Volunteers were helping so many people. But I also think the reason I'm grieving this closure is because of the special connection I have to both the country and the PCVs there.

During my senior year in high school I spent a month in rural Honduras working on an aid project. On one of my days off I met three Peace Corps Volunteers, who drove up to the ranch where I stayed. I ended up helping them with their clean water project and, by the end of the day, knew I wanted nothing more than to be a PCV. I no longer remember those Volunteers' names, but they showed me how to make a positive difference in the world. They also taught me that the biggest impact the Peace Corps makes is by building personal relationships between Americans and people around the world.

It's because of those Volunteers that I joined Peace Corps. So I hope in a few years the Peace Corps will return to Honduras.

Doomsday Clock is great propaganda but a poor predictor

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has now adjusted the minute hand on their famous Doomsday Clock. This is significant because the clock, first created in 1947 to "convey how close humanity is to catastrophic destruction," has only been previously adjusted 19 times across six decades.

As a symbol, I have nothing against the Doomsday Clock. In our individual lives it’s always a good thing to remember we’re all mortal—that one day we will die, meaning we’d better live the best life we can in the time we have left. The same sentiment applies to the fate of our species. It’s a goodness to remember that, despite what the human ego may scream at us, our species has only existed on this planet for a short time and could easily go the way of the dinosaurs (those that weren't the ancestors of birds, that is).

However, as an accurate predictor of how close humanity is to destruction the Doomday CLock leaves much to be desired. For example, the above image from Wikipedia shows how close humanity was to destruction during the clock’s 65 year history. The closest we’ve supposedly come to killing ourselves off was in 1953, when we were at “2 minutes to midnight” after the United States tested the first thermonuclear device, followed nine months later by a similar H-bomb test by the Soviet Union.  But while the Doomsday Clock in 1953 warned of our imminent destruction, a study of history shows humanity was actually further away from killing itself than the clock suggested.

Yes, the risk of a nuclear war existed during that time period. But the stockpiles of weapons controlled by the U.S. and Soviet Union in 1953 were not yet sufficient to destroy humanity. That wasn’t, however, the case in 1962, when the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred. In recent years it has been revealed that this incident came extremely close to triggering a nuclear war at a time when there were indeed enough weapons to destroy the world.

But despite this, the Doomsday Clock in 1962 was relatively far removed from doomsday and was about to climb to the "safest" position it has been at any time except for immediately after the end of the Cold War. What I believe this shows is that it’s not true scientific analysis which drives the Doomsday Clock—it is the political perception of the involved scientists. The explosion of the first H-bomb was a startling event for the human psyche. For the first time, we had the ability to create weapons which could—if produced in sufficient numbers—destroy the world. It didn’t matter that there were not yet enough of these weapons to actually do this deed. All that mattered was perception.

The same thing happened in the late 1980s, when numerous arms control treaties were passed and the Cold War ended. The Doomsday Clock was literally behind the times and had to be continually reset to reflect this new reality.

So while the Doomsday Clock is a great propaganda tool for reminding humanity of the harm we could do to ourselves, as a predictor of the actually risks of an apocalypse the clock is as flawed as any other human artifact.

My Epic ConFusion Schedule

After months of slow blogging due to the continual intrusion of that "life" thing, I’m now returning to more regular posting. And the first big news to post is that I’m attending the Epic ConFusion convention from Jan. 20-22 in Detroit. This looks to be an amazing con, with a stellar line-up of authors including

  • Pro GoH -- Patrick Rothfuss
  • Toastmaster -- Jim C. Hines
  • Saladin Ahmed
  • Elizabeth Bear
  • Tobias Buckell
  • Kameron Hurley
  • Jay Lake
  • Cat Rambo
  • John Scalzi
  • Catherine Shaffer
  • Ferret Steinmetz
  • and many, many more.

This will be one of the few con appearances I’ll make this year, so please drop by if you’d like to grab a signed copy of Never Never Stories or simply want to shoehorn me into a in-depth discussion on arcane SF topics.

My schedule is as follows:

10am, Saturday: Grammar Police in Salon F
Anne S. Zanoni, Christian Klaver, Jason Sanford, Charles P. Zaglanis

1pm, Saturday: Science in Fantasy in Salon F
Jason Sanford, Catherine Schaffer, Dr. Phil Kaldon, Jim Hines, Cindy Spence Pape

3pm, Saturday: Reading by Jason Sanford and Bradley Beaulieu in Athens      

5pm, Saturday: Mass Autograph Session in Salon E

8pm, Saturday: Reviews and Criticism in Niles
Gretchen Ash, Howard Andrew Jones, Jason Sanford, Christine Purcell, Robin Hobb

11am, Sunday:  Small Stories in Epic Fantasy in Salon E
Bradley Beaulieu, Robin Hobb, Patrick Rothfuss, Jason Sanford, Brent Weeks

If you’re attending the con, I hope you'll look for me and say hello.

Strange Horizons and Successful Online Magazines

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

Online speculative fiction magazines are held to a strange standard of success. Even though the best e-zines reach far more readers than most genre print magazines, there are continual questions on the viability of these online publications. One of the most recent regurgitations on this theme came from Simon Owens, who asked on his site, Bloggasm, if genre e-zines will ever find a profitable model.

Owens’s essay yielded a ton of predictable outrage as people dissected his analysis, with many commentators questioning Owens’s underlying assertion that an online magazine isn’t legit unless it makes a profit. The irony, of course, is that one of the most successful online genre magazines around—and one specifically mentioned by Owens—is Strange Horizons, an e-zine which doesn’t even attempt to be profitable. Instead, this magazine operates as a 501(c)(3) non-profit and pays its authors and artists while the magazine’s staff work as unpaid volunteers. Obviously this model is successful since Strange Horizons is not only about to celebrate its 8th anniversary, the e-zine is also one of the dominant genre magazines either on or off the web.

One of the strengths of Strange Horizons’s non-profit e-zine model is they are very willing to take chances on new writers. This approach is in full bloom in the magazine’s June 2008 fiction offerings, with each of the five featured writers being essentially at the start of their careers. While several of them have stories forthcoming in magazines like Asimov’s and Baen’s Universe, for all of them, their story in Strange Horizons appears to be one of their first professional publications.

The first story, “On the Eyeball Floor” by Tina Connolly, is set in a fascinating futuristic cyborg factory, which more closely resembles an industrial-era heavy industry factory than what passes for manufacturing in the surgical-scrubs environment of today’s Silicon Valley. The story focuses on a factory worker named Bill, who helps the newly assembled cyborgs transcend into consciousness. You see, just as human kids need to develop their consciousness after birth, so too are cyborgs not instantly gifted with this most human of characteristics.

Unfortunately, helping cyborgs achieve consciousness is extremely draining. Every time Bill helps awaken a cyborg, he feels like he loses a piece of his own soul. As Bill descends into madness from this job pressure, he fixates on a defective female cyborg who can’t quite achieve consciousness. To make matters worse, the cyborg looks like a woman Bill lost out on to a fellow coworker. Part love triangle, part musing on what makes us human, the story starts off well but bogs down toward the end amidst too much ambiguity. Still, Connolly’s story is written with a keen ear for language and presents some fascinating imagery and ideas. She is definitely a writer to keep an eye on.

Running” by Benjamin Crowell is an updated take on the old science fiction standby of space station residents only receiving air and vital supplies if they contribute to the welfare of the entire space colony. In short, freeloaders are not permitted. So when Joe loses his job, marriage, and visa, but doesn’t take the next shuttle back to Earth, he is fitted with a device which measures the bare minimum of oxygen he’s permitted to consume until the next outbound flight. Unfortunately, this libertarian view of the future has been around so long that it’s barely even interesting. Worse, while Joe’s character is basically a good person, he doesn’t elicit a lot of sympathy from the reader because he’s so passive about his fate. I mean, he’s like “Oops, I missed the shuttle to Earth. Oops, I’ve been kicked out of my marriage. Oops, I lost my visa to stay in the space station.” When Joe finally does make a decision shortly before the end of the story, he merely proves that humans will do almost anything to survive. While this story is well written, it simply can’t move past the incredible weight of all the SF history on this subject.

In Lieu of a Thank You” by Gwynne Garfinkle is an updated take on those late-19th/early-20th century mad scientist stories like The Island of Doctor Moreau, in this case focusing on a gentleman researcher who is attempting to merge animals and humans into new hybrids. In Garfinkle’s version of this oft-told tale, the researcher has his henchman kidnap a proper Victorian lady, one Miss Vanessa Grand. After grandly showing Vanessa previous examples of his work—such as tropical fish which can fly—the researcher explains that he is going to graft butterfly wings onto Vanessa. But where the original mad scientist tales would have had the female victim falling into hysteria and screams at such horror, Vanessa’s response it totally unexpected—and forms the crux of the story.

Unfortunately, the dialogue and writing are a bit stilted at times, such as when the narrator states that “I am Miss Grand. Vanessa Grand. And I demand to know who you are and where you have taken me, and for what purpose.” Or when Vanessa thinks, “In that moment, at least, I knew I was alive.” Even though the author is obviously playing with the cliches and flat writing of 19th/early 20th-century horror literature, this approach causes the reader to stumble over certain phrases and dialogue. Still, Vanessa is a fun character, and the moment she gives her opinion on having butterfly wings grafted onto her body is priceless.

My Greedy Plea for Help” by Ted Prodromou is a philosophical exploration of magical wishes, and how both those granting wishes and those receiving them try to twist words to their own advantage. The story involves meta-wishes—such as wishing for more wishes—and mixes in the philosophy of Douglas Hofstadter, who helped popularize the term “meta” in his 1979 book Gödel, Escher, Bach. There is some clever wordplay in this story, but at only 770 words in length, this story isn’t truly a story. Instead, it is an anecdote of a man and a genie on a beach, with a weak plea to the reader at the end for a “wish lawyer, a lexicographer, a symbolic mathematician, and a fierce rhetorician.” Perhaps one of those people would enjoy the story, but most readers should give it a pass.

That brings us to the best of Strange Horizon’s June offerings: “Jimmy’s Roadside Cafe” by Ramsey Shehadeh. In recent years there has been a boom in post-apocalyptic tales, as evidenced by John Joseph Adams’s excellent anthology Wastelands: Stories of the Apocalypse, and the large number of TV shows and films on this subject, such as I Am Legend and Jericho. Theories on why this boom exists are many. Perhaps it is a cultural reaction to 9/11, terrorism, war, and politics. Or maybe the trend results from humanity’s general unease about where the future might go.

“Jimmy’s Roadside Cafe” fits 100% into this post-apocalyptic genre, with a plague having devastated the northeast corridor of the United States. Into this scene of devastation steps a lone survivor named Jimmy, who opens a thrown-together shack of a cafe in the median of an interstate clogged with abandoned cars. Even though Jimmy has, like everyone else, suffered horrible losses, he still tries to help those few survivors who come his way. Initially the reader will think he is crazy. But by the end of the story, we instead see that he is offering that rarest of gifts—human empathy—to a grieving world.

One problem I have with many post-apocalyptic tales is that the stories only showcase the worst of humanity. In grim times, both the best and worst of humanity are on display. The character of Jimmy definitely belongs to this better half, as he waits in his little shack like an off-kilter angel of mercy. This is a heart-breaking and heart-filling story, perfectly written in a sparse style, which makes it one of the most emotionally satisfying stories I’ve read in months. This will be on my long list of the year’s best stories and is highly recommended.

Returning to the aforementioned essay about the profitability of online magazines, it’s probably too much to ask that people stop questioning the viability of online genre publishing. But as Strange Horizons approaches its 8th anniversary, I suggest from this point on that anyone who whines about the viability of online genre publishing should have a great big cream pie of Strange Horizons thrown in their face. After all, connecting readers with great stories will always be the most important test of how viable an e-zine truly is. And in this regards, Strange Horizons continues to shine.

Best Short Story of the Year: Movement by Nancy Fulda

As we near the end of the year, the literary SF/F award season is ready to crash down upon us. Many of the year's best anthologies have announced their picks, the Nebulas are open for nominations, and everyone has an opinion about which stories are award-worthy.

In a few weeks I'll release my complete list of the stories and books I plan to nominate for the Hugo, Nebula, Locus, and other awards. But before then, I want to highlight one story which will absolutely be on my year's best list. In fact, it's hard to argue that this isn't hands down the best short story of the year.

The story I refer to is the amazing "Movement" by Nancy Fulda, originally published in the March 2011 Asimov's and reprinted online in both print and audio formats by Escape Pod.

As Nancy says over on her blog, "Movement" is about a "teenage girl with a fictional variant of autism and it toys with the intersections between neurology, temporal dynamics, evolution, and chaos theory." But as with all great stories, that summary doesn't begin to do it justice. I suggest you immediately go read it.

I think the reason I relate to the story's narrator is I have a similar sense of time and place. Perhaps this results from working as an archeologist, or perhaps this sense was always there. I simply can't help looking at the world and seeing it as if I'm an archeologist excavating everything from a thousand years in the future.

This hard SF story is insightful, lyrically written, moving, and eye-opening while retaining an almost effortless flow, and is one of the few stories I've immediate reread upon finishing.  I only hope that one day I can write a story equally as full of insight, emotion, and truth as "Movement."

Review of Strange Horizons, March 2009

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

Earlier this year I immersed myself in online fiction through the annual storySouth Million Writers Award, which it’s my joy to run. The great thing about the award is it’s a fun way to keep up with online fiction trends—and the biggest trend this year was how the number of quality online short fiction venues grew massively over last year. There are almost too many great stories being published online.

Which is, I guess, my lame-butt way of segueing into an excuse for why this review is so late. The truth is there’s so much online fiction being published these day I OD’ed on it for a while. By the time I was ready to resume reviewing Strange Horizons fiction for The Fix, I was staring at such a backlog of stories my procrastination synapses kicked in. I avoided reading the magazine, dreading the work before me.

Which was a lousy thing to do, because the March 2009 Strange Horizons stories are among the best they’ve published in recent memory.

First up is “Diana Comet” by Sandra McDonald, author of the SF trilogy The Outback Stars, The Stars Down Under, and the recently released The Stars Blue Yonder, all of which update traditional military space opera by adding in a female lead and romance. The result is a series not only filled with lots of action, but one which might help create a new subgenre of romantic military SF.

With her Strange Horizons story, McDonald leads readers into a totally new universe. Diana Comet, an upper-class reporter and self-professed “champion of the underclass,” has just arrived in the city of Massasoit, where she is searching for her vanished fiancé James. For fans of McDonald’s previous novels, the story is an abrupt change—instead of far future panoramas, the city of Massasoit is set in a slipstream-influenced 19th century, where the poor live truly wretched lives, and the rich tower above the filth and stench of the actual city.

While Diana might be seeking a straight-forward answer to what happened to her betrothed love, she keeps running headlong into secrets piled onto secrets. Not, of course, that she doesn’t also have her own unspeakables to keep hidden. As with all McDonald’s writings, this story is well written and a visual treat, taking the reader into a new world which is at once familiar and, with a second glance, totally unique. Recommended.

The next story is “Nira and I” by new writer Shweta Narayan. Shaya and her friend Nira witness the honor killing of Shaya’s beloved aunt Hemal, merely for being interested in a boy from another caste. But Hemal isn’t killed only for defying tradition; she is also murdered because her family fears by going against tradition she will invite the mists into their lives.

You see, in this land mists conceal everything—roads, houses, buildings—and a person who doesn’t remember how the land is supposed to exist can easily lose both their way and their life. Shaya, Nira, and all the members of her caste are rememberers, who help others find their way safely through these dangerous mists.

But Shaya and Nira are also kids, and as with all kids, they care little for the laws and customs which the older people follow. As they flaunt their caste rules, they discover the mists aren’t what they’ve been lead to believe. It also turns out there’s a way to get rid of the mists, but most people are too fearful to follow that path. At turns surreal, metaphoric, and frighteningly real, this is one of the most exciting stories I’ve read all year. Highly recommended.

Another new writer, Sean E. Markey, fills the next spot in Strange Horizons with his second person fantasy “The Spider in You.” In this world, people worship spider gods, which live in their houses. If you survive three of their bites, they’ll grant you strength and fortune for the rest of your life. The problem, though, is surviving those three bites. When children reach a certain age, they must be bitten, causing many to die. And that’s not even taking into consideration the bites from spiders which have no intention of letting their charges live.

This story is extremely disturbing, as it’s meant to be. And like “Nira and I,” the tale plays on metaphor to an interesting degree. But where “Nira and I” wrapped its social consciousness around wonderful characterization and a deep world view, “The Spider in You” is too stand-offish with its readers, likely due to the weak second-person narration. Still, it is an interesting read.

The final story from March is also the first pure science fiction story of the month, “Turning the Apples” by Tina Connolly. On a distant world, Szo sells cell phones to newly arrived tourists, who come for the world’s famous waterfalls and parks. The trick, though, is there’s an infection on this planet, which one-half of one percent of all off-world tourists come down with. As Connolly writes, “Getting infected makes your brain rewriteable. Surviving makes you able to rewrite.”

Szo is one such rewriter, able to reprogram the brains of infected tourists so they can be sent off to do horrific jobs like hauling radioactive waste. Rewriting someone’s brain is also an incredible high which Szo keeps trying to quit, only to be dragged back into the work by the criminals who run this racket.

“Turning the Apples” is a fascinating story which I totally enjoyed, with a great character in Szo. In fact, I was so wrapped up in the story I ignored a major believability issue until after I finished (i.e., that tourists would keep coming to an alien world where there’s even a slight chance they might disappear into a horrific infected life). Despite this minor quibble, fans of unusual science fiction stories will enjoy this tale.

Strange Horizons and the Ideal Story Length

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

What’s the ideal short story length? Such a simple question, yet one that’s impossible to answer without embracing the old cliché that “a short story should be only as long as needed to tell the story.”

According to the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, short stories fall into the following categories: true short stories, with fewer than 7,500 words; novelettes, between 7,500 and 17,500 words; and novellas, with more than 17,500 words. Anything longer than 40,000 words is deemed novel-length fiction. And while those are the official divisions of the short story—at least with regards to how the Nebula Awards are distributed—there’s a further informal classification for short stories, with stories under a thousand words being counted as flash fiction.

It would seem there’s a length for every type of fictional tale. However, that’s not how the publishing industry views the situation. For major book publishers, fiction revolves almost exclusively around the novel. Short stories—don’t even talk to publishers about short stories! While science fiction and fantasy novels sell very well, shorter speculative fiction is a hit and mostly miss affair. As a result, short stories are mainly published in genre magazines, few of which approach the sales of even the weakest genre novels.

This simple marketing fact sometimes results in strange twists in the life cycle of stories. For example, Greg Bear’s novelette, “Blood Music,” is often listed among the best science fiction novelettes of the last quarter century, having won both the Nebula and Hugo awards. A few years after writing the story, Bear expanded it into a novel which, while well received, doesn’t match the power of the original novelette. Even though the expanded novel was easier for publishers to market and sell—and it’s quite likely more people read the novel than the novelette—that doesn’t change the general critical opinion that the novelette was the perfect length for Bear’s classic story.

But again this begs the question, what is the ideal length for short stories? And again, the answer is: It depends.

The October, 2008, selections of Strange Horizons‘ fiction offer a perfect opportunity to explore the question of how long short stories should be. Some of these stories are perfectly suited for their allotted length. Some should have been expanded to more perfectly fit the tale.

The first, “Swan Song” by Joanne Merriam, takes us into the mundane life of a woman who sorts Medicare claims for a living, a job which pays well enough but is nothing to write home about. Mixed into her life are semi-comical but realistic episodes with her coworkers, a live-in boyfriend, and her mother.

But soon the narrator becomes aware that the people around her are having the same recurring dreams as they begin dying from an unknown disease. Worse, as this disease goes epidemic, those who get infected are unconcerned. The reason: the infected experience a deep feeling of being both completely understood and at perfect peace. As a result, the victims are happy and content right up until they die.

The story is very well written and also engaging, which is impressive because the first third deals with a rather boring look at a rather boring life. This is to be expected, as most day-to-day lives are boring. We wake up, we go to jobs we’d rather not do, we carry on at conversations we’d rather not have. But the strength of Merriam’s writing is that this day-to-day tedium holds as much poetry and resonance and insight as the more tense scenes later in the story, after the epidemic has been revealed.

“Swan Song” is a very good example of a midrange short story, hitting a mere 3,600 words. In fact, many critics consider the 3,000-word range to be the perfect short story length, if such perfection can actually be said to exist. “Swan Song” is just long enough for the reader to comfortably settle into, but not so long that the story begins to wear the reader down.

The next story, “The Lion and the Mouse” by Kaolin Imago Fire, is a futuristic retelling of the Aesop’s fable of the same name—the difference being that in this short tale, the robotic mouse is the one with the power while the outmoded lion is always weak. It is also an anti-fable, but not in good way. Unlike the original fable, which ends with its famous moral of “No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted,” this fable ends with a lot of flash and bang but no deeper resonance for the reader.

At 1007 words—just over the flash fiction length—”The Lion and the Mouse” is definitely the proper length for its story. But the problem is that, as with so many flash fiction stories, the author had to rely on clichés and jargon to compress the story to this length. This stylistic shortcut enables a quick connection for in-the-know readers, but can leave others with a case of “What the hell?” For example, in one short paragraph alone, the following terms and phrases are used without contextual definition or explanation: “molybdenum,” “learning routines, “broad spectrum white noise,” and “EM in a scrap Faraday cradle.” Any reader who isn’t up on their jargon will be lost. This makes the retelling read more like a computer programmer’s fable, designed to be enjoyed by one with the needed familiarity with the computer-based jargon, which the narrator throws around like the debris found in the mouse’s junkyard home.

Our next tale, “Just After Midnight” by Christie Skipper Ritchotte, is another piece of flash fiction, this time clocking in at a mere 624 words. But unlike “The Lion and the Mouse,” Ritchotte keeps the story’s focus firmly on characters the reader can relate to—in this case, a sister and her diseased brother. The disease, part of a larger epidemic which has devastated the world, has left the brother with the intelligence and behavior of a dog. The sister actually takes her brother for walks on a leash through their now dangerous neighborhood.

In line with my previous criticism of flash fiction, “Just After Midnight” relies at times on fictional shortcuts, such as not helping the reader understand words like “fem-skins.” Overall, though, “Just After Midnight” works well and carries a strong emotional punch. Because it is so short, it’s difficult to mention too many plot details without giving too much away. But let me just say that after finishing it, I couldn’t help but compare it to another dystopian story published this year, “Pump Six” by Paolo Bacigalupi (from his short story collection Pump Six and Other Stories). “Just After Midnight” contains many of the same themes as Bacigalupi’s much longer novella, and it would have been interesting to see “Just After Midnight” expanded to a longer length so the reader could experience more of this fascinating world and its amazing characters. So while I liked this story, I came away hungry for much more.

The final Strange Horizons‘ story is “Nine Sundays in a Row” by Kris Dikeman. This elegantly written piece is an exciting new take on a fantasy trope I’d thought nearly done to death—the trickster at the crossroads story. This time, the story is told from the point of view of the trickster’s dog, who watches over those poor souls who wait at the dark crossroads in vain attempts to win their heart’s desire.

The person wanting the trickster’s help this go around is a poor girl in a poor land, a setting much like the lush and damned Mississippi landscape where musician Robert Johnson supposedly made his own deal with the trickster. In this case, the girl is desperate to escape from a life which is literally killing her and dreams of becoming a card shark in that fabled gambling city in the distant western desert.

The dog isn’t having any of this. He knows that his master never lets anyone get the better of him on these deals. But as the dog and girl become friends, the dog realizes that there are limits to what he can do to save her life. In this conflict between helping the girl and obeying his master, the dog’s wonderful voice drags the reader through the tale like a chew toy with no chance—or desire—of escape.

I can’t praise Dikeman’s writing enough. She strikes the perfect note between evocative descriptions of the land and moving the tale along. She also creates memorable characters with just a few words and lines—characters which tug at your emotions as the tale winds down to its tragic, or perhaps uplifting, conclusion. An amazing story and highly recommended.

I should also add that at 4,700 words, “Nine Sundays in a Row” is the perfect length for this tale. If it had been expanded to novelette length, perhaps so the author could show us more of the poor girl’s heartbreaking life, the reader likely would have been numbed by the casual brutality of the setting. If the story had been shorter, the reader wouldn’t have been able to experience the nuance and beauty which emanates from the characters and their interactions with each other.

In the end, I suppose the only true answer to the question of the ideal short story length is indeed that old cliché. A story should be only as long as is needed to tell the story.

If, that is, the story is done right in the first place.

Strange Horizons and the Exclusionary Genre World

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

Science fiction writers have a dirty little secret: Sometimes we don’t like outsiders entering our imaginary worlds.

It’s not that we don’t like readers. After all, every literary genre lives only through the graces of that genre’s readers. The problem for science fiction writers, however, comes in explaining to the general public many of our genre’s current insights—concepts such as the singularity, neural downloads, nanotechnology, ansibles, and so on. While all these concepts are well known to science fiction insiders, they can easily confuse people who don’t continually immerse themselves in the genre. So every time science fiction authors write a story, they have to decide how much explanation they’re willing to give for ideas which their biggest fans are likely already familiar.

The result is a chasm between science fiction which is accessible to the general reading public and that which can only be appreciated by science fiction insiders.

In many ways, this issue with science fiction exclusion is a lesser echo of the problems within academic writing, where insider-laden jargon and references prohibit the general public from reading many academic works. This problem has become so bad that for a time Denis Dutton, editor of the scholarly journal Philosophy and Literature, ran a contest to highlight bad academic writing. Dutton’s experience with the contest led him to write an influential essay lambasting academic writing for its “language crimes.”

This raises two questions: Does science fiction risk going the way of academic writing, enjoyed by only a small insider group? Or can the genre still produce great works of literature for the larger reading public? Answers to both questions exist in the September, 2008, fiction published by Strange Horizons.

An example of a very good insider’s science fiction tale is “There Once Was a Fish” by Brandon Myers. This story is about a human scientist who loses herself—both physically and mentally—while exploring an alien species on a distant world. This species is far beyond humanity in both intelligence and how they exist in relation to our universe. While the scientist travels on this world, her young daughter, Milvia, whose age is never given but is likely five or six, remains behind on the scientist’s spaceship with a virtual intelligence called Nannynoo. When Milvia’s mother disappears among the aliens, Nannynoo encourages Milvia to save her mom.

Myers’s story is well written and, by showing this alien world through the eyes of a small child, offers an interesting view on humanity and the universe. The problem is that the story is too vague about its different plot devices, including Nannynoo’s artificial intelligence, the transcendent intelligence of the aliens, “reproduction by declension,” and how the aliens exist across multiple dimensions. Readers already familiar with such concepts will enjoy this story; newer readers to the genre will have a tough time and likely come away confused.

The only thing that didn’t work for me in Myers’s story was the opening epigraph, which is a made-up scientific quote from the child’s mother. The epigraph felt like the quotations one finds at the start of many academic tomes. While epigraphs are supposed to expound on the work’s theme, many authors use this device to showcase how profound their work is. The reality, of course, is that too often epigraphs have the opposite effect by making a work feel pretentious.

Pretentiousness, unfortunately, is a problem one encounters in the next Strange Horizons story, “Cowboy Angel” by Samantha Cope. Published in two parts, this tale isn’t technically science fiction, but neither is it any genre of speculative fiction except in the most fleeting of senses. The story follows the life of Roxanne, a tarot card reader who hooks up with an outlaw musician named Nick. Roxanne is always doing the wrong things in life as she runs full tilt toward her death, while Nick is one of those “misunderstood” geniuses who hide their deep inner selves by drinking and hurting everyone around them. As the story progresses, the readers experiences scenes of sex, motorcycles, and barroom musical performances intermixed with Nick abusing Roxanne.

There is a good story buried in “Cowboy Angel,” but it’s buried beyond hope of discovery in the tale’s endless narrative. In addition, the characters never reach beyond their stereotyped existence to fully engage the reader. It’s almost like Cope forced her story to go in a certain direction instead of letting the characters dictate their own path. This feeling is reinforced by the story’s section headers, which feature the names of famous tarot cards (and are supposed to reflect what happens in that section of the story). This literary device has been done to death in recent years and reinforces the awkward box into which this story was forced to live.

The next story, “Kimberley Ann Duray Is Not Afraid” by Leah Bobet, returns Strange Horizons to firm science fiction grounds. This is also a very good example of a story which can be embraced by those unfamiliar with the genre. Set in the near future, the story opens at what appears to be an abortion clinic, complete with protesters, a bombing, and staff both scared by the violence and committed to doing their duty. However, it quickly becomes apparent the clinic is actually there to help people change their skin color through a new medical procedure. Protesters scream that this is tantamount to genocide against specific ethnic groups, while supporters say the procedure merely proves that all racial categories are nothing more than social constructs.

The story is narrated by a white woman named Kim, who works at the clinic and is married to a black man named Colin. While Kim and Colin deeply love each other, they are also unable to move past the racism which both permeates their relationship and the greater world of the story. This conflict causes Kim and Colin to make an all-too-predictable decision as the story progresses.

Leah Bobet is a great up-and-coming writer. Unfortunately, this isn’t one of her best tales. The idea of changing one’s race has also been done before, most importantly by African American author George Schuyler in Black No More, a 1931 satirical novel in which a black doctor discovers a way to turn black people white. While Bobet’s story is interesting, it doesn’t carry the weight and impact it would have had even a decade or two ago. Still, this is a good example of how science fiction can explore deep issues while also remaining accessible to the general reading public.

The best Strange Horizons story this month is also one that manages to appeal to both science fiction insiders and the general reading public: “The Future Hunters” by Christopher J. Clarke.

Set in Australia four thousand years after Earth’s ecological collapse, the story is about a middle-aged engineer named Kale and her attempt to save her people. Despite the ecological problems of the world, Kale’s people have managed to stabilize their location so their small community can survive, if not thrive. However, as more and more of their children die each year, Kale knows their settlement has become so isolated and inbred that their eventual fate will be extinction unless new people are brought into the society.

Clarke’s story addresses a number of big scientific issues—including founder effects, genetic drift, and population bottlenecks—without over or under explaining these concepts. In both tone and language, Clarke’s tale wonderfully evokes Walter M. Miller, Jr.’s A Canticle for Leibowitz, one of the most famous examples of a science fiction novel which also appeals to readers outside the genre. “The Future Hunters” is highly recommended.

Earlier in this review I raised two questions, each of which pointed to the different paths science fiction can take as it tries to either broaden or narrow its audience. I don’t know which way the genre will go. And it isn’t necessary for science fiction to always appeal to all audiences. There is a place for stories which are narrowly tailored.

But as Christopher J. Clarke’s “The Future Hunters” so successfully shows, any population—or literature, in our case—which becomes too insular and inbred risks extinction. So I hope science fiction authors keep writing stories which attempt to reach beyond the genre’s already existing audience. Only by doing so will science fiction have a truly great future.

Author Nearly Trapped in Avalanche of Ego-Destroying Rejection Slips

Dateline Jason's Desk -- During a routine desk cleaning, a sudden avalanche of papers and magazines engulfed science fiction author Jason Sanford today, trapping him for several minutes.

"I was truly fortunate," Jason said. "I was buried by those science fiction magazines which have already published my stories. Thankfully, that's a tiny, almost insignificant pile and I was quickly able to dig my way out."

While scientists agreed that Jason had a close call, fears of an additional collapse continue to grow. "While Jason is correct that his pile of acceptances isn't big enough to pose a threat of bodily harm to anyone," avalanche expert Ivana Falls said, "his nearby mountain of rejection slips is another matter."

This mountain of rejection, easily reaching several stories in height, is the accumulation of all the smashed dreams from Jason's writing career. Included among the rejections are the elusive six-year rejection letter, the rejection from the editor who ridiculed Jason's personal hygiene even though the two of them had never met, and the rejection from the scammers at the International Library of Poetry, which accept every poem sent their way but made a special exception for Jason's writings.

"Yeah, that rejection pile scares the heck out of me," Jason said. "If it collapses, I'd easily be crushed beneath the oppressive, humiliating, ego-crushing weight of years of rejection."

As of the filing of this report, there is no word on what Jason plans to do with the stack of checks he's received for his stories. But according to Ivana Falls, this stack poses no threat. "I mean, we're talking about a writer who only publishes short stories. How much money could be in that check pile? Five dollars? Maybe ten at most?"

This reporter shared a cruel chuckle with Falls before setting off for the hospital's burn ward to poke fun at the survivors of the most recent literary flame war.

Yes, Not All Flash Fiction Is Bad

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

When my editor asked me to review the November 2008 offerings from Bruce Holland Rogers’s shortshortshort.com, I was tempted to ask if said editor knew of my reputation around flash fictional lands. After all, an essay I wrote a while back stirred up some angry feelings among flash fiction writers. This feeling was added to, no doubt, by my decision to exclude stories under a thousand words from consideration for the Million Writers Award for best online fiction, which I run each year.

That’s just me. As a reader, I prefer longer stories. And I sometimes wonder if that’s simply the nature of flash fiction. People either love these short short stories, or they hate the entire idea of them.

I’m well acquainted with the hurt feelings my view has caused because people email their feelings on the subject to me. Repeatedly. Years after my essay was buried in the wilds of the net, I still receive messages with words like “ignorant” and “unfair” in them. Perhaps I should have warned my editor, but I didn’t. So if any short short pitchforks need to be raised at such a biased reviewer as myself daring to review an author’s flash fiction, take the anger out on me. My editor is innocent.

That long introduction is my way of admitting I’m not a fan of flash fiction. So it is with baited breath that I await the reaction to this review, in which I totally enjoyed one of Bruce Holland Rogers’s flash fictional offerings, liked a second, and was frustrated as hell by the third.

The first story, “Acknowledgments,” is a hilarious take on all those pompous author acknowledgments we see at the start of books. How many times have you glanced over one of these acknowledgments—glanced over, because honestly, who reads them except the people named within—and you find your eyes glazing over at a clichéd opening like: “A book like this one is never the work of only the author…”

Well, what’s a cliché in the hands of one author turns into pure gold in another’s, as Rogers uses that very opening for “Acknowledgments.” From there he plumbs the depths of those people who truly helped the author in the creation of his latest literary masterpiece, people like that jerk of a professor who slept with his undergrads and got fired, thereby ensuring the author fell into the professor’s tenure-track job. While it’s probably a stretch to call this a true short story—it’s more of a wonderful joke—the story is great fun and laugh-out-loud hilarious.

The next story, “Alexandrian Light,” is a more traditional flash story. Two geologists sit in the middle of the Amazonian rain forest, waiting for one of three armies to reach them: the Russians, the Americans, or the Sino-Japanese. The three great powers are racing to claim the geologists’ discovery of an alien spaceship complete with dead aliens and all the secrets humanity can dare to imagine. But the geologists know none of these armies will treat them well for the discovery, so they do the only unspeakable thing they can think of.

The story is extremely well written and extremely visual, and starts off with a bang. But just as you settle in for the ride, it is over, with far too many questions unanswered. And that is my continual frustration with flash fiction. I’m the first to admit that if a story only needs 500 words to tell the story, then dang it, stick to the 500 words. But if a story needs several thousand to do the subject and setting and characters justice—which is the case with “Alexandrian Light”—please give me those extra words.

The last story is appropriately titled “The Last Man on Earth.” Not a word is said to why this is the last man on Earth, but once the man satisfies all his physical needs—food, shelter, and packs of dogs to protect him—he realizes that a man just isn’t a man without a woman. One day, he discovers a department store manikin and brings her home. From there, his descent into true loneliness and insanity begins. A good story, which accurately describes in only a few words what it took Richard Matheson an entire novel to accomplish with I Am Legend.

So there you have it—three stories, three different reactions. I repeat my earlier admissions of bias against flash fiction and leave it to others to determine whether I’ve been fair or not.

Strange Horizons and Writing What You Read

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

One of the clichés thrown at new writers is “Read the publications you submit to!” The reasoning being that each magazine’s fiction uniquely reflects the wants and desires of a particular editor. If a writer’s fiction doesn’t match what the editor already publishes, why waste everyone’s time by submitting to said editor?

As with all clichés, there’s some truth to this. People who read Sheila Williams’s Asimov’s Science Fiction or Gordon Van Gelder’s Fantasy & Science Fiction know the general type of stories to be found in those venues. That doesn’t mean Sheila or Gordon won’t still surprise—all great editors love to throw curveballs at readers—but I’d bet if you presented regular readers of those magazines with ten unidentified stories, most could state which stories belonged in which magazine.

The problem with this cliché, as with all clichés, is it doesn’t always hold true. For example, take the January 2009 fiction from Strange Horizons. I’ve been reading Strange Horizons for a number of years, and have been reviewing it on a regular basis for most of the last year. But just when I thought I’d nailed down the types of stories published in Strange Horizons, dang it if the editors didn’t pull a switcheroo to shock me out of my complacent talk of clichés.

Let me explain. Typically, Strange Horizon stories tend away from hard science fiction, instead embracing more of the fantasy and slipstream genres. Their stories also usually have a general literary feel—which for the sake of argument, I define as stories in which the voice and style matters more than plot, setting, or characters.

This isn’t meant as criticism. Stories that Analog: Science Fiction and Fact would publish—hard science fiction, with lots of action—would rarely find a home in Strange Horizons, and vice versa. Different magazines, different worlds of storytelling.

As an example of what I’ve come to expect from Strange Horizons, examine their first January, 2009, story: “Sisters of the Blessed Diving Order of Saint Peter and Saint Andrew” by A. C. Wise. This is a wonderfully sweet, singsong of a tale about Lucy, a girl raised by underwater nuns. Straddling the line between science fiction and fantasy—which is the hallmark of the slipstream favored by Strange Horizons—the story is a literary examination of how Lucy wants to stay in her underwater monastic order, but also desires to push beyond the order’s constraints and actually help people (and, specifically, dead people). Unfortunately, the order’s mother superior feels that the people Lucy wants to help are unclean, merely because they have the bad misfortune of being deceased. Naturally, Lucy doesn’t take this “hell no” as final, and seeks her own approach to helping the dead.

I really enjoyed this story, despite the fact not much actually happens plot-wise (although in many ways, this is a mirror of how most people live their lives, where not much appears to happen until after the fact, at which point we’re amazing at all which occurred). What carried me through Wise’s story is the author’s strong voice. As a result, the reader overlooks the tale’s weaker technical aspects, such as how this group of nuns could survive for decades underwater using nothing but hard-hat diving gear. All in all, this is a very good slipstream story that long-time Strange Horizons readers will enjoy.

And if that’s where Strange Horizons had stopped for the month, I wouldn’t be dwelling on the types of fiction published by different magazines. But instead, the next story I read is “Greetings from Kampala” by Angela Ambroz, a crazy science fiction ride which is both unsettling, irritating, fascinating, and one of the best character-driven stories I’ve read in a long while.

“Greetings from Kampala” is the story of Ghada, an African woman who took the “big drop” through a hole in space to serve as a soldier in the ongoing war between futuristic Hindu and Chinese empires. Unfortunately, each time one goes through a hole in space, you not only risk a very high chance of death, your very sanity is also placed up for grabs.

Ghada winds up on the spaceship Rahu Ket—saved in a rare act of wartime mercy—only to discover that the ship’s captain is her former boyfriend. Unfortunately, due to relativistic and space drop issues, her former boyfriend is now 40 year older than the last time she saw him, while she has aged a mere five years. As if that wasn’t maddening enough, Ghada is also harassed by an overworked ship doctor pretending to be a psychotherapist, who seeks to convince Ghada that she must examine the insanity in her life if she is to move beyond it.

As dictated by the subject matter and setting, this story’s narrative is difficult to embrace at times, and is likely to leave some readers with a deep sense of WTF? But this confusion also represents the life Ghada has been thrown into. As such, the story has a true New Wave feel to it, reminding me of Samuel R. Delany’s “Aye, and Gomorrah…” (minus the sex). I predict readers will either love or hate this story. Myself, I loved it. Highly recommended.

After reading a story which would have been nicely at home in Harlan Ellison’s Dangerous Visions, I wondered what the Strange Horizons editors were up to. Then came the next story—”The Shangri-La Affair” by Lavie Tidhar—and I knew the truth: the editors were messing with our minds, deliberately selecting stories we don’t expect to see in Strange Horizons.

Told in two parts, “The Shangri-La Affair” opens in a near-future Southeast Asia as an unnamed man books passage on a newly reconstituted Air America. Like its Vietnam War predecessor, this Air America flies “anything, anywhere, anytime,” and is one of the many covert players in the regional war now raging between various powers.

The story’s unnamed secret agent convinces pilot “Richard—but call me Rick”—to fly him into Vientiane, Laos, where the agent tries to track down an engineered virus called Shangri-La. It turns out Shangri-La is dangerous to the powers-that-be because Shangri-La causes people to embrace pure and total peace. However, the secret agent isn’t convinced that forcing people into a zombie-like peace is a good thing, so he aims to stop the virus from being unleashed.

Tidhar’s story reads like a drug-infused John Le Carré novel, if Le Carré wrote science fiction and dropped LSD as he pounded on the typewriter. The narrative is tense and action-based, pulling the reader through a story with flat-out beautiful prose. The result is a tale which is both fun to read, and a fascinating glimpse into the madness of future wars. All in all, an amazing accomplishment, and highly recommended.

So all hail the clichéd death of believing specific magazines can only publish specific types of stories. While magazines and editors do indeed develop their own voice, they can also break away from that voice. And as the case of Strange Horizons‘ January fiction shows, leaving a magazine’s voice behind can be a wonderful thing to behold.

Strange Horizons and the Big Questions in Life

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

It sometimes appears that humanity is fated to eternally ask deep questions while receiving few deep answers in return. Perhaps this is because we humans are very good at posing the big questions—What is the meaning of life? What is the nature of good and evil? Is there a God?—but not so good at finding equivalent answers.

That said, from the point of view of anyone who loves science fiction and fantasy, it’s probably a good thing that humanity doesn’t have too many deep answers. After all, one of the strengths of the speculative fiction genres is that genre stories can easily plumb the big questions and mysteries we all ponder. If humanity truly possessed all the answers to life, there wouldn’t be a need for fantasy or science fiction in the first place.

And so it is we turn to the July 2008 fiction offerings from Strange Horizons, where each story explores life’s big questions in its own unique way. The first tale, “Called Out to Snow Crease Farm” by Constance Cooper, is set on a distant world colonized by humans. Unfortunately, the world is extremely hostile to Earth based life-forms, so the settlers have been forced to do without cattle and other familiar farm animals. To survive, the settlers domesticated the planet’s alien life-forms for their own uses, even though without proper preparation, these animals are poisonous to consume.

Into this scenario steps Margit Gazaway, a newly minted veterinarian assigned to serve on this planet. Unfortunately, she hasn’t been trained in the biology of the planet’s strange animals, making her less knowledgeable in this area than the very farmers she is called on to help. So the big question for Margit is this: Is it better to admit to ignorance or pretend to knowledge one doesn’t have? By the end, Margit makes her choice as she discovers that the first step to true knowledge is admitting one’s ignorance. “Called Out to Snow Crease Farm” is nicely written, with lots of creative worldbuilding. Unfortunately, there is so much exposition needed to set up the story that the tale is heavily weighted down in its first half, creating a slow start from which the remaining half never quite recovers.

The next story, “The Magician’s House” by Meghan McCarron (published in two parts in Strange Horizons), takes a different approach to exploring the big questions of life, in this case by examining the process by which we learn to ask the right questions in our lives. McCarron starts the tale off as if desiring to create a hormonally charged teenage version of the novel Holes, as a nameless teenage girl digs holes in a magician’s backyard in an attempt to learn about the earth based power which exists in all magic. McCarron’s lush writing is on display in these opening sections, as she describes hole after hole in an extremely sensual, sexy manner. If this feels like an obvious play off the Freudian theories of dark caves and holes and such, then yes, that is exactly what McCarron is doing. This truth is seen again when the protagonist discovers her magic is wedded to the earth itself, leading her to create dark tunnels and climb into caves and rip just about every page out of Sigmund Freud’s psychosexual playbook.

This story is extremely tied up with teenage angst and hormones and dreams of growing up. But it is also about the protagonist’s search for the meaning to her life. The magician, with his tacky ’80s clothes and his orange and lime green furniture, is an unlikely mentor. But even as the reader is disturbed by the sexual relationship which develops between this teacher and pupil, we also realize the magician is correct when he says that awakening to our own lives and power is sometimes slow and safe, and sometimes fast and demanding. Either way, we have to choose how we awaken to life. And no matter our choice, the life we awaken to may not be the life we expected to find. So it is with the protagonist in this story.

Few writers could have pulled off this story without falling prey to the very sexual stereotypes which make up its meat and blood. But just like the scene where the nameless girl dances with other magicians around a raging fire—trying to stay on that fine line between being burned by the fire’s heat and frozen by the winter’s cold—McCarron’s lyrical prose enables the tale to dance close enough to these stereotypes to share their power and truths while also refusing to be singed by cliché. “The Magician’s House” will likely make many of the year’s best lists and is highly recommended.

The final July story from Strange Horizons is “Marsh Gods” by Ann Leckie. Set in an ancient marsh village, Voud is a ten-year-old girl whose family controls valuable local fishing rights. The story opens with Voud frightened because the men of her family are suffering mysterious deaths. When her last brother, the ne’er-do-well Irris, is killed, Voud suspects that a fellow villager is consorting with dark powers in an attempt to take her family’s wealth.

Anxious to learn what to do, Voud consults with the local marsh gods—brown cranes who have a compact to protect the village. Unfortunately, the gods are very limited in what they can do. If they lie, they lose their power, and the gods these days don’t have a lot of power to go around. But then Irris shows back up in the village, impossibly alive and showcasing a new and improved personality for all to see. Before long, Voud learns that not all gods lack for power.

This is a fun read centered around extremely believable characters—both human and gods—who are merely trying to survive in an ever-changing world. What takes the story beyond most fantasies is its central question: What is the difference between a lie which can never be true and a lie which is only a lie until the world itself is reshaped to turn lie into truth? This story is recommended for anyone who enjoys a good fantasy.

The common thread among these stories is that they function both as good fiction—with the engaging characterization, plot, and prose that are the hallmark of all top-notch short stories—and as philosophical laboratories where writer and reader can explore the big questions we all face. But don’t come to these stories expecting simple answers. Because good science fiction and fantasy stories are like a skilled magician, one who keeps the truth hidden even as her sleight of hand distracts the audience. You can so easily obsess over what happened to that rabbit, or where the cards in her hands disappeared to, that you only later realize how much more was going on than you could ever possibly understand.

Just like a great magician, science fiction and fantasy stories succeed when they trick the reader into seeing beyond the tale to the bigger questions in life. And in these three stories from Strange Horizons, this trickery is in full bloom. So sit back and enjoy. And don’t be disturbed if you leave these tales pondering questions to which we’ll never have any satisfactory answers.

Where Does Google Plus Go From Here?

We've reached that point in the development of Google Plus where technology pundits suddenly declare this new social media network a complete failure and predict nothing but DOOM, DOOM, DOOM! Of course, it was only a few months ago that these same people were praising Google Plus and calling it the Facebook killer. But if there's one thing no tech pundit can embrace it is consistency.

The truth is that growth patterns of new human activities – no matter if the activity is based around a piece of technology, a social movement, or a new boy band – follow rather predictable patterns:

  1. First you have an intial growth spurt stimulated by early adopters. 
  2. Then the growth evens out as word spreads about the new activity. The activity can also collapse at this stage if not enough people are impressed with it.
  3. Next the activity begins another impressive growth spurt as it penetrates into the general population. 
  4. And finally, the activity either becomes an enduring artifact of human expression or, as more often happens, it turns out to be a passing fad whose popularity craters as we fickle humans move on to other pursuits.

The time span for these four steps can vary anywhere from a few weeks to a few years or more, but the basic arc of people accepting something new rarely changes. In my opinion Google Plus is now just past the early adopter stage and fully within the second "even growth" stage. But while it is possible for activities to fail to engage people at this stage – as it is also possible at the early adopter stage – Google Plus already has enough users that it should move successfully to the third stage and catch the attention of the general population. That's where the true success or failure of Google Plus will be decided.

If what I'm saying is true then obviously it is far to early to declare Google Plus a failure. And the fact that Facebook has responded so aggressively to Google Plus by redesigning their social media interface shows that Mark Zuckerberg and company are well aware of the danger posed by their new competition.

So what do I think about Google Plus at this point in its development? Personally, I still prefer the clean interface of Google Plus over Facebook. I've also found that Facebook's recent redesign fails to impress me. 

That said, I'm also using Google Plus less than I did when I was an early adopter. Part of this is due to my personal time being dominated by editing and writing projects. However, I've also noticed that the personal interactions I so enjoyed during the early days of Google Plus are not happening as much. (I suspect this is one reason so many pundits are yelling "GoogleFail!") For what it's worth, though, I remember a similar pattern happening during the early days of Twitter, in that precarious time between people babbling excitedly about their first few Tweets and the social network turning into something people used on a daily basis. I suspect this is a normal part of the second stage of growth of a social network.

So if you're going to predict the failure of Google Plus, I'd suggest waiting another year or two. If by that point Google Plus is still struggling to engage people with people, then yes, it will face a rough future. But my money's still on Google Plus succeeding.

Strange Horizons and New Writers of SF/F

Note: A few years ago I wrote a series of monthly reviews for The Fix Short Fiction Review. Unfortunately, The Fix is no longer around so I'm reprinting these reviews on my website.
 

Pity new writers of SF/F short stories. They come to the genre bubbling with exciting ideas and linguistic beauty, and smack right up against reality. The simple fact is that publishing short fiction in professional speculative fiction markets is not only downright hard, it’s also very much like the proverbial fart in a hurricane—no matter how much of a stink a new writer makes with their short fiction, they’ll gain only a fraction of the attention a decent first novel receives.

The problem is not the weakness of the short story genre or the magazines that publish these stories; the problem is that the publishing world is totally geared toward novel-length fiction. Readers go to bookstores looking for novels. Publishers promote SF/F novels to the almost total exclusion of everything else in the genre.

Which is, of course, a shame. The short story is the purest form of fictional storytelling, and it is through the practice of creating short stories that the best writers hone their craft. A decent writer can turn out a decent novel by dumping a ton of situations and characters into the medley and letting them go at each other. But if said writer did this with a short story, the story would be easily seen as the crap it is. As a result, short story writers learn to balance description, narrative, plot, characterization, and insight against the need for the story to both make sense and be beautifully told. To do otherwise is to guarantee that a short story will fail.

Because short stories demand so much from their authors, it is no coincidence that the best SF/F writers cut their teeth on the short story form. Before Gene Wolfe created the masterful Book of the New Sun—in which not a word or character or event isn’t tied to the greater plot—he created a number of top-notch short stories and novellas (which are now collected in the must-have collection The Best of Gene Wolfe: A Definitive Retrospective of His Finest Short Fiction).

Because new short stories writers have such potential, one of the most important roles SF/F magazines have is to cultivate new talent and bring them to the attention of readers. Yes, their stories may not gain as much attention as a first novel filled with epic fantasy hijinks. But discriminating readers know that in the long run, it’s the new writers of short fiction who will likely set the literary world on fire, not the writers who jumped in front of a computer one day and babbled their way to a 100,000 word first novel.

The February 2009 fiction from Strange Horizons features four stories from new writers. The first is “This Must Be the Place” by Elliott Bangs, which is also Elliott’s first professional publication. The story is the tale of Andrea, who is newly dumped, slightly drunk, and far from home when she meets Loren Wells in a San Francisco club. Loren is a fascinating guy who seems to already know Andrea, which simply can’t be true. But then Andrea discovers Loren’s secret: he is a time traveler from the future, reliving over and over what he consider the best year in history.

Elliott’s story is well-told, with a sharp style that enhances the story without ever overwhelming the actually storytelling. For example, when Andrea is dumped by a new boyfriend, she mutters that “All Bud had left me was a heap of dirty bowls and spoons, a crap sci-fi paperback, and that same old case of rabies,” with the rabies being her curiosity to discover who this Loren Wells character truly is. Because this is a first story, there is a small problem with the narrative. The story is set in 1984, but the reader doesn’t realize this until halfway through the story (meaning the writer should have set up this little fact better). But the mere fact that someone from the future would want to relive 1984 over and over delighted the hell out of me, while the story’s ending is as perfect as can be. As a result, the reader can’t help but overlook the story’s minor flaws. Recommended.

The next story is “Obedience” by Brenna Yovanoff, a new writer who has previously been published in Chizine. “Obedience” starts off as a typical zombie story, with the remnants of a military platoon pinned down in an old house by smirkers, the disease-created zombies who smile as they tear you to shreds. Private Grace is one of the platoon’s survivors, and she and a medic are on a wild-goose chase to see if the medic has truly stumbled onto a cure to the zombie disease.

Yovanoff’s story is fast-paced and exciting, although it doesn’t move beyond the zombie stereotype we’ve all seen of a small band of survivors fighting against an overwhelming tide of flesh-eaters. However, Yovanoff’s idea to have the zombie smile sends shivers up the spine, and the ending is a true reflection on people turning from high-minded ideas and beliefs when civilization itself is being destroyed.

The First Time We Met” by Maria Deira is the character-driven story about the different ways people become mutually dependent on each other. Narrated by a middle-aged Hector, the story focuses on his girlfriend Elena, who he met when they were teenagers. Elena can heal wounds and injuries with her saliva, and when she meets Hector and notices his bleeding arm, her first reaction is to lick this stranger’s wound.

If that sounds disgusting, this story probably isn’t for you, since the story also explores Elena’s pre-Hector relationship with a girl who cuts herself. Elena continually heals the girl’s wound, after which the girl cuts herself again to keep the two of them dependent on each other. While the story was a little scattered for my tastes, it was still a good read, which is always a great thing to say about an author’s first professional publication.

The final story is “Sometimes We Arrive Home” by K. Bird Lincoln, an author who has been previously published in Strange Horizons and an assortment of online magazines and print anthologies, but is still very much at the start of her career. “Sometimes We Arrive Home” is a short tale about Seri and Pimiko, two East Asian refugee girls who are transported to new worlds by their House and ever-controlling Mother. This story is very sensually told, with lush prose and vivid characterization. Lincoln also perfectly captures the mindset of young girls thrown into a strange universe, not an easy thing to do in only two thousand words. While the story is vague about many aspects of its setting and outcome, it is still a fascinating read.

So there we are: four new writers, and four stories to showcase their abilities. All of these writers deserve watching over the coming years.